Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is 600x microscope sufficient?
#17
Mr. Sharpco, I edited my post and babbled - "Looking at the third image again I see diagonal scratching on the bevel that is not present on the part that is not deburred.  Because of that scratching,  I now think that image may from the Scotch-Brite rather than the Exacto.  It makes little difference as the results were the same."

Also I originally uttered, "So by hand, using light moderate pressure I dragged the blade for about an inch or two over the belt and took a picture of it.  To my surprise it worked.  That Scotch-Brite surface grabbed the LOW and broke it off but didn't remove any of the wonderful toothiness."

Additionally, Mr. Mark stated he can do the same with a stone.

So no.  Power equipment is not needed.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by SHARPCO - 12-11-2018, 07:35 PM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by grepper - 12-12-2018, 01:07 AM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by SHARPCO - 12-12-2018, 05:10 AM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by EOU - 12-12-2018, 10:29 AM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by SHARPCO - 12-12-2018, 11:22 PM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by Ken S - 12-12-2018, 02:30 PM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by EOU - 12-13-2018, 09:44 AM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by SHARPCO - 12-13-2018, 10:07 PM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by SHARPCO - 12-30-2018, 06:16 PM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by grepper - 12-31-2018, 10:25 PM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by SHARPCO - 01-04-2019, 01:21 AM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by grepper - 01-03-2019, 11:39 PM
RE: Is 600x microscope sufficient? - by grepper - 01-04-2019, 01:49 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)