Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Math vs. Myth
#6
(03-21-2019, 06:59 PM)grepper Wrote: I pick myth.  That way I can just blunder forth and simply say my knives are scary sharp or wicked sharp, etc., and never have to actually understand anything about method or the repetition of results.  All this exacting data is not fair.  Nobody ever told me I’d have to think!

It is amazing to think that for the entire history of the world the only way to communicate sharpness was via words like “scary” or “wicked” or crude subjective tests like rope or cardboard cutting.  

Mr. Mike literally changed the world of sharpening when he gave us edge testers and BESS.  Now someone in AU can sharpen a blade to 41 and I know exactly what that means.  It's wicked sharp!

Thank you Mr. Mike!

2xthumbsup
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Math vs. Myth - by Sam Sloane - 03-21-2019, 11:35 AM
RE: Math vs. Myth - by Ken S - 03-21-2019, 12:35 PM
RE: Math vs. Myth - by Sam Sloane - 03-21-2019, 12:58 PM
RE: Math vs. Myth - by grepper - 03-21-2019, 06:59 PM
RE: Math vs. Myth - by Mark Reich - 03-22-2019, 11:55 AM
RE: Math vs. Myth - by Bud - 03-21-2019, 07:03 PM
RE: Math vs. Myth - by SHARPCO - 03-22-2019, 09:40 PM
RE: Math vs. Myth - by grepper - 03-22-2019, 09:48 PM
RE: Math vs. Myth - by SHARPCO - 03-23-2019, 05:26 PM
RE: Math vs. Myth - by Kwakster - 03-23-2019, 10:43 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)